Blox Lending and Jason Anderson Sue Digital Licensing for Breach of Contract and Defamation
On Tuesday, December 16, 2025, Blox Lending and Jason Anderson filed a complaint in the Third Judicial District Court for Salt Lake County, State of Utah, against Digital Licensing, Inc. (DLI), Roydon Bleak Nelson, and Schad Brannon.
Blox Lending, a Nevada-based limited liability company registered in Utah, and Jason Anderson, a Utah resident, allege breach of contract, unjust enrichment, conversion, and defamation.
The complaint states that Blox Lending developed blockchain technology used to create cryptocurrency ecosystems, including elements like nodes, licenses, NFTs, wallet applications, user and administrative dashboards, websites, and payment gateways. Blox Lending claims that it entered into a “Memorandum of Understanding” (MOU) with DLI, a Wyoming corporation, to license this technology for a cryptocurrency ecosystem known as “DEBT Box.” The MOU allegedly stipulated that Blox Lending would receive $1 million per DEBT Box project and $0.99 for each user registration.
Blox Lending asserts that it launched 14 projects within the DEBT Box ecosystem and is entitled to $0.99 per user registration, totaling at least $17,552,212.92. They claim $3,587,832.22 remains unpaid.
The lawsuit also alleges that DLI, Nelson, and Brannon approached Jason Anderson about launching a “BLOX” project within the DEBT Box ecosystem. Anderson agreed, contingent on Blox Lending receiving the project revenue. Blox Lending claims it modified its intellectual property to launch the BLOX project, which allegedly generated license fees of no less than $205,434,069. Blox Lending asserts that DLI received all the revenue but has not paid Blox Lending any portion of it.
In addition, Blox Lending claims it purchased 20 “DIG” licenses from DLI for $100,000, with “Total Protection Plus” (TPP) coverage, allowing Blox Lending to sell the licenses back to DLI at a later date. Blox Lending states that the TPP website, which facilitated buybacks, became inoperable, depriving Blox Lending of a material feature that induced the purchase.
The complaint further alleges that Blox Lending paid $350,000 to a law firm to secure representation for itself, DLI, Brannon, and Nelson in a separate lawsuit filed in the Utah federal district court. Blox Lending claims it expected reimbursement from DLI, Brannon, and Nelson, who allegedly promised to repay the amount upon gaining access to their assets, which they eventually did. Blox Lending claims it has not been reimbursed.
Blox Lending also alleges that in March 2024, DLI, Brannon, and Nelson misrepresented the need for an “audit” of the DEBT Box ecosystem tokens, including 18,351,938 DEBT tokens owned by Blox Lending. Jason Anderson authorized his brother to provide wallet information, including private keys, to a DLI representative. Blox Lending claims that DLI, Nelson, or Brannon then used these keys to transfer the DEBT Tokens out of Blox Lending’s control, depriving Blox Lending of their value, estimated at $26.0411 per token, or $477,904,653 in total.
Jason Anderson separately alleges defamation against Schad Brannon, claiming Brannon made false and defamatory statements about him in messaging applications and other written communications. These statements allegedly include claims that Anderson is part of a “crime family,” embezzled money, laundered money, and committed financial crimes. Anderson claims these statements have damaged his economic relationships and caused him economic and non-economic damages, including pain and suffering and emotional distress, amounting to no less than $300,000.
Please contact BlockTribune for access to a copy of this filing.
